Countries with Extradition Treaties with Singapore

Parliament of Singapore · 13 September 2016

Official Report, 13 September 2016, Vol 94, Issue 24 · Open in the reader (summaries, search, filters)

27

Er Dr Lee Bee Wah asked the Minister for Law (a) how many countries have signed bilateral extradition treaties with Singapore; (b) why there is no extradition treaty with Thailand; and (c) what are the considerations before Singapore seeks an extradition treaty with another country.

The Senior Minister of State for Law (Ms Indranee Rajah) (for the Minister for Law): Madam, Singapore has bilateral extradition treaties with the United States, Hong Kong and Germany, and extradition arrangements with 40 declared Commonwealth countries, including Canada, under the London Scheme for extradition within the Commonwealth.

We also have special extradition arrangements with Malaysia and Brunei based on the endorsement of arrest warrants. We have signed an Extradition Treaty and a Defence Cooperation Agreement as a package with Indonesia, which is pending ratification by Indonesia. Singapore is also a party to a number of multilateral instruments which provide for extradition. These include the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages and the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings.

As a responsible and effective member of the international community, we are committed to facilitating greater international cooperation to combat transnational crime, in accordance with our domestic laws and international obligations.

For Singapore to have an extradition treaty with another country, for example, Thailand, there must first be a common desire from both countries to have an arrangement for the reciprocal handing over of fugitives in the interest of law and order. Both countries must find it mutually beneficial to enter into such an arrangement. The next step is then to examine each other's legal systems and procedures to determine compatibility. Sometimes, these arrangements are easier to conclude when countries come from the same legal traditions and have very similar legal systems and procedures. Where there is greater divergence in the respective legal systems and procedures, the differences will need to be rationalised or a consensus be reached as to the legal procedures to be applied before an arrangement can be concluded.

Mdm Speaker: Er Dr Lee Bee Wah.

Er Dr Lee Bee Wah (Nee Soon): Thank you, Mdm Speaker. Without the extradition agreement, we saw that in the famous robbery at Holland Village, the culprit cannot be brought back to Singapore. So, it led many people to think that what if there are more foreigners who come here and commit crime, and then run to Thailand. I would like to ask the Senior Minister of State whether there is a plan to sign more such extradition agreements with our neighbouring countries.

Ms Indranee Rajah: Mdm Speaker, as I indicated in my response earlier, it much really depends on the country in question because there are a number of factors in play. Compatibility of legal system is one of them, obviously. But I think in the context of neighbours, I am able to say that ASEAN has been discussing a model ASEAN Extradition Treaty as a sort of a template, and this model will, when finalised, provide a useful basis for ASEAN member states in their own bilateral negotiations for extradition treaties with one another. So, it is something that is being looked at, a sort of framework that member countries can tap on should it turn out that the circumstances and conditions are right for them to enter into bilateral arrangements.

Source: Singapore Parliament Official Report (Hansard) for 13 September 2016. Republished on SGParliament.