POWER SERAYA GENERATORS (Switch to Orimulsion)

Parliament of Singapore Β· 21 November 2005

Official Report, 21 November 2005, Vol 80, Issue 14 Β· Open in the reader (summaries, search, filters)

Column No : 1820

POWER SERAYA GENERATORS:

(Switch to Orimulsion): 20.

Dr Geh Min asked the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources (a) what will be the environmental impact of Power Seraya's switch to Orimulsion for three of its power generators; (b) if an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was done; and (c) if so, whether the results of this study can be made available.

The Senior Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources (Assoc. Prof. Koo Tsai Kee) (for the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources): Sir, in 2001, Power Seraya proposed to retrofit three of its fuel oil electricity generating units to use orimulsion. As with all major industrial and power plant projects, Power Seraya was required to conduct an environmental Pollution Control Study (PCS) to assess the environmental pollution impact of the proposed retrofitting. Power Seraya engaged a specialist consultant to prepare a PCS report which is available for public access from Power Seraya on a request basis.

The PCS report ascertained that without pollution control, the combustion of orimulsion would emit higher levels of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matter (PM) than fuel oil currently permitted for use in electricity generation in Singapore. It therefore recommended appropriate pollution control measures to mitigate these impacts.

These measures include installing (i) flue gas desulphurisation equipment to remove SO2 in the flue gas and convert it into calcium sulphate, which is a useful product commonly known as gypsum; and (ii) high-efficiency electrostatic precipitators to remove PM in the flue gas.

With these equipment, the use of orimulsion by Power Seraya would not only comply with the pollution standards stipulated in the Environmental Pollution Control Act (EPCA) and its Regulations, the SO2 and PM emissions would be 70% and 60% lower than fuel oil power plants respectively. NEA therefore approved Power Seraya's proposal.

Mr Speaker: Order. End of Question time.

[Pursuant to Standing Order No. 22(3), Written Answers to Question Nos. 20and26 on the Order Paper are reproduced in the Appendix*. Question Nos. 21-25 and27-29have been postponed to the next available sitting of Parliament.]


  • Cols.1929-1932.

Column No : 1821

BILLS INTRODUCED:

Source: Singapore Parliament Official Report (Hansard) for 21 November 2005. Republished on SGParliament.