CHANGE OF USE OF PREMISES (Particulars)

Parliament of Singapore · 31 January 1978 · 4th Parliament

Official Report, 31 January 1978, Vol 37, Issue 5 · Open in the reader (summaries, search, filters)

18

Mr Teong Eng Siong asked the Minister for National Development and Communications (a) how many applications for change of use of premises have been received between 1st January, 1977, and the latest convenient date; (b) how many applications have been approved; and (c) how many applications have been rejected and the reasons therefor.

Dr Tan Eng Liang (for the Minister for National Development and Communications): Sir, from 1st January l977 to 31st December 1977, a total of 4,178 applications for change of use were received. Of this number 2,870 applications or 68.7% were approved whilst 459 applications or 11% were disapproved. 532 applications or 12.7% were withdrawn and the balance of 317 or 7.6% were carried forward to 1978 for consideration.

Generally, the 459 applications were rejected for one or more of the following reasons:-

(a) The proposed uses were contrary to the Master Plan zoning and planning intentions;

(b) The proposed uses would affect the amenity and privacy of the residents in the area;

(c) The proposed uses would cause traffic congestion and impede traffic flow; and.

(d) The sites were affected by public schemes.

Mr Teong Eng Siong: ( In Mandarin): Sir, I would like to ask the Senior Minister of State whether, in considering applications for the change of use of premises, his Department will exercise some flexibility so as not to cause economic hardship on the applicants?

Dr Tan Eng Liang: Sir, I have given the reasons for rejecting requests for change of use. While we appreciate the economic contributions from a particular sector, consideration is normally given. For example, extension of time is allowed for a person to move out of the premises for its illegal use. From the reasons for rejection that I have given earlier it is difficult or impossible to compromise. The only "flexibility" that we can give is to grant reasonably sufficient time for a particular case to be resettled.

Source: Singapore Parliament Official Report (Hansard) for 31 January 1978. Republished on SGParliament.